Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine

Patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICDs) often are excluded from receiving CMR scans at 3.0T due to ICD-induced image artifacts. This work aims to transfer sequence protocols established for CMR imaging in the presence of ICDs at 1.5T to a first human application at 3.0T. All measurements were performed on a clinical 3T MRI scanner. Phantom measurements were used to establish and optimize wideband PSIR LGE imaging at 3.0T. Volunteer measurements with externally placed ICDs were used for optimization of CINE imaging and wideband PSIR imaging. Thirdly, patients with implanted ICD were examined with the optimized protocols. Human measurements showed that SA stacks obtained with spoiled GRE after contrast agent showed a markedly lower artifact burden than the conventional approach. For scar imaging, a wideband PSIR with a bandwidth of 3kHz and a frequency offset of +750Hz allowed a sufficient suppression of relevant artifacts in the majority of scans. No strong correlation between the image quality and the distance between the cardiac silhouette and the device was detected. The presented work shows the feasibility of clinical cardiac MRI at 3.0T including GRE-CINE and wideband PSIR-LGE for patients with ICDs.

Aims: Myocardial strain enables sensitive assessment of cardiac function, but its clinical application has largely focused on individual chambers or selected patient populations. We evaluated the feasibility and clinical relevance of fully automated multi-chamber strain assessment in consecutive patients undergoing routine transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). Methods and results: This retrospective study included 8,350 consecutive adults undergoing TTE. A hospital-wide artificial intelligence (AI)-based system automatically measured left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain (LVGLS), left atrial (LA) reservoir strain (LASr), and right ventricular (RV) free-wall strain (RVFWS). AI-derived LVGLS was available from at least one apical view in 97.1% of patients and from all three views in 94.8%; LASr and RVFWS were available in 94.1% and 94.5%, respectively, resulting in complete multi-chamber strain assessment in 90.3%. Strain measures showed modest correlations with conventional chamber-specific echocardiographic parameters and differential associations with clinical outcomes. Gaussian mixture modeling identified three distinct clusters characterized by preserved multi-chamber function, RV-dominant dysfunction, and pan-chamber dysfunction. Compared with the preserved cluster, pan-chamber dysfunction was associated with the highest risk of all-cause death or heart failure hospitalization (adjusted hazard ratio, 3.44; 95% CI, 2.43-4.88; P<0.001). Prognostic associations remained evident in patients with LV ejection fraction (LVEF) [&ge;]50%, and cluster assignment provided incremental prognostic information beyond clinical factors, LVEF, and RV fractional area change. Conclusions: Fully automated multi-chamber strain assessment was feasible in a large consecutive TTE cohort. Integrating strain across cardiac chambers may provide complementary functional characterization and identify clinically relevant clusters with prognostic information beyond conventional assessment.

Background. Real-world 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) often have missing or corrupted leads. A deep-learning classifier can be prepared for this by random lead masking during training, or by injecting clinical knowledge, for example by pulling its attention towards the leads that guidelines use for each diagnosis. Whether this knowledge adds robustness beyond masking is unknown. Methods. Pre-registered comparison of three arms sharing one network (per-lead 1D-ResNet encoder and per-diagnosis attention over the 12 leads): standard training (M0); random whole-lead masking (M1); masking plus a Kullback-Leibler penalty pulling attention towards a fixed guideline-derived key-lead map (M2, guideline-based attention guidance). Six diagnoses; five seeds per arm. Development on PTB-XL (21,799 ECGs); single sealed evaluation on PTB-XL fold 10 (2,198 ECGs) and on CODE-15% (233,204 exams, external validation). Primary endpoint: AUROC difference M2 - M1, averaged over first-degree AV block, right and left bundle branch block and atrial fibrillation and over 1 to 6 lost (zeroed) leads, with a patient-level paired BCa bootstrap 95% confidence interval. Results. The guidance did not change robustness: {Delta}AUROC -0.0010 (95% CI -0.0033 to +0.0006), an interval entirely within the pre-specified +-0.02 margin; the result was unchanged with another bootstrap seed, other interval methods and leave-one-diagnosis-out analyses. Masking improved AUROC: M1 - M0 = +0.0134 (95% CI +0.0102 to +0.0172) when one key lead was lost, and the number of lost leads tolerated before AUROC fell by more than 0.02 rose from 7 (M0) to 10 (M1). M2 attention matched the map and M2 was non-inferior on intact ECGs, but its calibration slope was lower for all six diagnoses in both datasets. M2 lost slightly more when all key leads were lost together (-0.0067) and gained only when one to three leads remained (exploratory; AUROC 0.9408 vs 0.9210 with 11 leads lost). CODE-15% reproduced every pattern (primary -0.0007, 95% CI -0.0011 to -0.0003). Conclusions. Random lead masking suffices to make an ECG classifier robust to missing leads; adding guideline knowledge aligns attention with clinical criteria but adds no robustness and worsens calibration. Guideline-aligned attention should not be taken as evidence of robustness.

Background: Artificial intelligence (AI) may improve electrocardiographic differentiation of Takotsubo syndrome from acute anterior ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), but its impact on human diagnostic performance, the added value of visual explanations, and differences by reader background and experience remain uncertain. Methods: Using 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) images from two hospitals, we developed and externally validated an ensemble of three deep learning models after self-supervised pretraining and fine-tuning. The diagnostic task used ECGs recorded within 14 days after symptom onset, regardless of reperfusion status. We conducted a four-phase reader study. Phases 1-3 compared unaided interpretation, a reference sheet, and additional AI assistance. In Phase 4, readers evaluated a new ECG set after randomization to reference-sheet support alone, with AI predictions, or with AI predictions plus gradient-weighted class activation mapping (Grad-CAM) heatmaps. Diagnostic correctness was analyzed using generalized linear mixed-effects models. Exploratory analyses examined differences by cardiologist status and experience. Results: Development and external-validation cohorts, including healthy controls, comprised 832 and 95 participants, respectively. For Takotsubo-STEMI discrimination, external-validation accuracy was 0.914, with areas under the receiver operating characteristic and precision-recall curves of 0.970 and 0.984. Seventy healthcare providers completed the reader study. The estimated probability of correct diagnosis increased from 0.632 without assistance to 0.864 with AI assistance (odds ratio [OR], 3.71; P<0.001). In randomized Phase 4, AI assistance improved accuracy vs reference-sheet support alone (OR, 4.28; 95% CI, 3.08-5.95; P<0.001), and Grad-CAM provided additional benefit (OR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.04-2.25; P=0.033). Exploratory analyses showed greater improvement among less experienced readers; with AI assistance, non-cardiologists outperformed cardiologists. AI-assisted readers remained less accurate overall than the model alone. Conclusions: An ECG image-based ensemble differentiated Takotsubo syndrome from anterior STEMI and improved reader accuracy. Visual explanations provided additional benefit, while experience-related differences highlight the importance of effective human-AI interaction.

Background: Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) remains the gold standard for assessing left ventricular (LV) diastolic dysfunction (DD), but noninvasive alternatives are needed to overcome geometric and acoustic limitations. 4D-Flow MRI enables comprehensive assessment of intraventricular pressure differences (IVPDs) and flow propagation velocity (VP). We aimed to evaluate 4D-Flow-derived IVPDs and VP in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). Methods: Thirty-eight HCM patients and 38 age- and sex-matched healthy controls underwent TTE and 4D-Flow MRI. Spatiotemporal maps of velocity and IVPDs, decomposed into inertial and convective components, were derived along the main inflow streamline from the mitral valve to the apex. Peak early filling rate (PEFR) was used to normalize IVPDs and VP. Results: While absolute peak flow rates were comparable, HCM patients exhibited significantly faster VP (100.4 vs. 60.2 cm/s, p < 0.01) and higher positive early E IVPD (1.40 vs. 0.92 mmHg, p < 0.01) compared to controls. Normalizing IVPDs by PEFR amplified group differences, revealing a markedly increased flow-normalized E-IVPD (5.13 vs. 2.94 x 103 mmHg.ml1.s, p < 0.001) and deeper reverse ER IVPD (-6.06 vs. -4.61 x 103 mmHg.ml1.s, p < 0.01) in HCM. These differences were primarily driven by the inertial components. Multivariable analysis demonstrated that ER IVPD is independently determined by PEFR and the TTE E/E' ratio (r = 0.65, p < 0.001). Conclusions: 4D-Flow MRI-derived, flow-normalized IVPDs and propagation velocity provide robust, noninvasive markers of altered LV chamber stiffness and impaired diastolic filling in HCM, offering deeper 3D hemodynamic insights into diastolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND Timely cause-of-death (COD) information guides health policy, yet many deaths in low- and middle-income countries are not medically certified. In Africa, fewer than 10% of deaths are. Verbal autopsy (VA) yields a structured symptom questionnaire and a free-text narrative. Mortality surveillance increasingly records the narrative alongside the questionnaire, but the algorithms used to produce VA-based statistics were designed for structured responses only, so narratives inform physician COD assignment but do not contribute to algorithmic COD assignment. We evaluated whether supervised models could use both modalities to improve COD assignment. METHODS We analyzed 4,999 VA records for deaths at ages 12 years or older from a national sample of registered deaths in South Africa (RSA), using physician-assigned CODs as the reference standard. We trained unimodal and multimodal pipelines on the labelled records: pretrained language models (PLMs) fine-tuned on narratives alone, machine learning (ML) models on structured responses alone, and the two combined at the data, feature, and decision levels. We also prompted a locally deployed generative large language model (LLM) on the same unimodal and multimodal inputs, without parameter updates. All were compared with InSilicoVA, the operational comparator representing current automated practice. We evaluated individual-level assignment, population-level agreement, calibration, and generalization across provinces in RSA, reporting these metrics rather than ranking pipelines on any one of them. RESULTS Every supervised pipeline improved on InSilicoVA by 8.5-15.9 percentage points in top-1 accuracy and 3.5-7.1 points in cause-specific mortality fraction (CSMF) accuracy. The narrative and structured pipelines performed similarly in aggregate but differed by cause: 63.9% of deaths received identical predictions, 11.6% were correct only from the narrative pipeline, and 13.6% only from the questionnaire pipeline, with the narrative pipeline more accurate for noncommunicable causes and the questionnaire pipeline for communicable causes. Against the unimodal approaches, the decision-fusion pipelines added 4.2-5.4 percentage points in top-1 accuracy, concentrated in the most common causes, whereas feature fusion with cross-modal attention improved the less common causes, adding 6.6 points (95% CI, 1.7-11.5) in balanced accuracy and 5.5 points (95% CI, 0.6-10.3) in macro F1. Feature fusion reached the highest CSMF accuracy (95.7%). Paired differences from the better unimodal representative ranged from -0.2 to +3.4 points, with all intervals including zero. The LLM exceeded InSilicoVA on individual-level metrics and reached the highest balanced accuracy of any pipeline (60.6%), while the supervised pipelines retained higher CSMF accuracy. Supervised pipelines had lower expected calibration error than InSilicoVA. Supervised gains held across all nine held-out provinces, including every top-1 comparison and nearly every macro F1 and CSMF comparison. CONCLUSIONS PLMs using narratives alone substantially improved on current best practice and matched ML pipelines using structured responses, while multiple multimodal strategies produced further gains in individual COD assignment. The zero-shot LLM showed particular strength on rare causes, whereas supervised pipelines better recovered the population cause distribution. These findings support incorporating narratives as a core input to automated VA systems and evaluating representative fusion strategies for the intended output. External validation across settings and age groups will support broader implementation.

Background. Research data enclaves such as the All of Us Research Program do not allow participant-level data, or models fitted to them, to leave, which makes it hard to deliver case-finding models, which flag patients with possibly uncoded conditions for clinician review, to patients and clinicians. Objectives. We describe and technically evaluate a system that fits models outside an enclave from released summary counts and delivers them through standard health information technology interfaces. Methods. We exported dissemination-compliant summary counts from the All of Us Researcher Workbench and, outside the enclave, fitted versioned models for Long COVID, chronic fatigue, fibromyalgia, endometriosis, Lyme disease, lupus, migraine, depression, and anxiety. A model contract (a model file and a written specification), a Python reference implementation, and synthetic Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) test patients define the expected outputs. One JavaScript scorer runs in a patient demonstration, a SMART on FHIR clinician application, and a CDS Hooks service. An atlas displays aggregate results. We evaluated the system on synthetic records with automated tests, cross-implementation output comparison, launches through the public SMART sandbox, and a counterexample review of the scoring and display rules. Results. The deployed Long COVID model had an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.67 in a random validation split. The eight self-report models reached 0.61 to 0.82 in identifying self-reporters without a code. The JavaScript scorer reproduced all 162 reference outputs exactly, and all 437 automated tests passed. A counterexample review found 5 classes of failure, including scoring ineligible patients and treating unavailable data as absent, all fixed and added as tests. Conclusions. Models fitted from released summary counts can be delivered through FHIR, SMART on FHIR, and CDS Hooks with reproducible scoring on synthetic records. Real-record interoperability, usability, and prospective clinical performance remain to be evaluated.

Background: Anatomic isthmus 3 (AI 3) is defined as the myocardium between the pulmonary valve annulus and the ventricular septal defect patch that persists after tetralogy of Fallot (ToF) repair. Ventricular tachycardia (VT) propagated through slow conducting AI 3 (SCAI 3) represents a significant cause of morbidity in ToF. There is an unmet need for non-invasive identification of SCAI 3 in patients with ToF. Objectives: To assess whether the anatomic features of AI 3 as derived from cardiac computed tomography (CT) can predict slow conduction velocity during EP study. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included patients with ToF who underwent an electrophysiologic study and had AI 3 width measured from the pre-procedure cardiac CT. All patients underwent programmed ventricular stimulation, and electroanatomic. Logistic regression was performed to assess the relationship between AI 3 width and the presence of SCAI 3. Results: Of 27 consecutive patients with ToF, twelve patients were found to have SCAI 3, and ten patients were found to have SCAI 3 mediated VT. The AI 3 was significantly narrower in patients with SCAI 3 compared to those with normal AI 3 conduction (18.4 +/- 6.6 mm vs. 29.2 +/- 9.0 mm; p = 0.001). An AI 3 width above 21.5 mm carried a negative predictive value of 80.0%. Conclusion: In adults with repaired ToF referred for electrophysiology study, a narrower CT-derived AI 3 width was associated with SCAI 3 identification. AI 3 width measured on a CT obtained before PV replacement could help guide invasive risk stratification.

Background: Conventional discrimination metrics, such as the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), do not characterize the composition of outcomes among patients flagged as high risk by clinical prediction models. This limitation is particularly relevant in critical care, where competing deaths and incomplete follow-up can complicate the interpretation of prediction alerts. We developed the Balanced Risk Integrity Index (BRII), a stratum-level metric defined as the proportion of target events among target events, competing deaths, and early-censored observations in a flagged high-risk stratum. BRII is algebraically related to positive predictive value (PPV) and is reported alongside its component decomposition to characterize the outcome composition of flagged patients. Methods: We evaluated BRII using seven acute kidney injury (AKI) prediction models developed in MIMIC-IV and externally validated in MIMIC-III and eICU-CRD (116,010 patients in total). Additional simulations examined the effects of competing deaths and early censoring on BRII and conventional model performance metrics. Results: For 48-hour AKI prediction in the top 10% risk stratum, BRII ranged from 0.90 to 0.96 in MIMIC-III, compared with less than 0.26 across all models in eICU-CRD, where 61.5% of evaluated patients were censored before the prediction horizon. In the eICU-CRD top 10% strata for the same target, 37.0% to 50.2% of patients were censored early, 12.2% to 15.5% had AKI, and 3.4% to 8.1% died before AKI. BRII and PPV ordered at least one model pair differently in 34 of 48 cohort-outcome-top-k groups. Under simulated random censoring for 48-hour AKI prediction, BRII declined by up to 0.80 while binary-label AUROC changed by less than 0.02. Conclusions: BRII provided complementary information on high-risk stratum composition, yielding different model rankings from PPV and revealing substantial differences across external validation cohorts. Interpreted alongside PPV and its component decomposition, BRII offers a standardized approach to evaluating clinical prediction alerts across models and observation environments.

INTRODUCTION: The digital clock drawing test (dCDT) is a cognitive screening tool capturing high-resolution pen-movement data. Existing approaches for classifying cognitive impairment from dCDTs rely on selected features or image-based methods. We propose representing dCDTs as structural networks to classify cognitive impairment and characterize spatial organization in clock drawings. METHODS: Weighted networks were constructed from 3,362 Framingham Heart Study participants, with and without cognitive impairment. Network representations were generated separately for command and copy conditions, with nodes representing pre-defined clock components (digits, hands, clock face) and edges capturing pairwise spatial relationships between components. Random forest models and graph convolutional networks were trained to predict cognitive impairment from the networks. Models were benchmarked against demographics-only and established summary feature baselines. RESULTS: Network-based models achieved AUC values comparable to the established summary feature baseline across command-only and copy-only conditions. Differences in spatial organization between the cognitively intact and impaired groups were greatest in the upper-right clock region, involving digits 1 and 2, the clock hands, and the surrounding clock face. Differences between the command and copy networks were larger among cognitively impaired participants. DISCUSSION: The proposed network representations provide an objective, scalable, and flexible framework for representing clock drawings for use in classification models. dCDT networks matched the predictive performance of established summary feature-based approaches and identified clock regions where spatial organization differed by cognitive status. After external validation, this approach has the potential to be incorporated within a clinical workflow to support automated and interpretable cognitive screening.

Awareness of comorbidities in people with dementia is vital context for dementia research and clinical management. Natural Language Processing (NLP) applied to free text in the electronic health record (EHR) may help ascertain comorbidity presence. Our aim was to assess the validity of the MedCAT Comorbidity NLP app in a cohort of people with dementia. We used text from the EHR of South London and Maudsley NHS Mental Health Trust via Clinical Records Interactive Search (CRIS), linked to structured data from local primary care (Lambeth DataNet) and hospital admission data in a cohort of 3,543 people with dementia. We evaluated MedCAT Comorbidity, examining internal validity via manual review of text and external validity by cross-validation against linked primary care and hospital data; and comparison of the predictive value of comorbidity measures for mortality. Internal precision was highest for atrial fibrillation (100%) and lowest for diabetes (78%). Cross-validation with linked data varied substantially across conditions, with precision from 96% to 59% and recall 77% to 4%. The median number of comorbidities identified was two using any single source, or three when combined. MedCAT Comorbidity demonstrated predictive ability for mortality (HR 1.11 per condition), although the model fit was better using comorbidity from hospital admission data. In people with dementia, the MedCAT Comorbidity app showed high precision for most conditions during internal validation. The variability of precision and recall on external validity assessment partly reflects incomplete documentation. Results from the MedCAT comorbidity app can assist researchers in understanding comorbidity of cohorts, particularly when primary care or hospital data is not available. Our findings highlight the need to develop quality assurance protocols that include internal and external validity checks before deploying general data extraction apps for specific clinical subpopulations.

The explosive growth of ambient AI scribes in healthcare has focused almost exclusively on relieving clinician documentation burdens and enhancing clinician efficiency and reducing burnout. While most research has focused on the clinician experience, these same types of tools, such as a patient held AI Personal Health Assistant, can be put in the hands of patients to facilitate communication with healthcare providers, to provide greater autonomy and activation for patients in managing their own healthcare, and to facilitate the task of receiving and retaining complex new information. However, to ensure these tools serve as more than just administrative aids, we partnered with a large technology company to conceptually codesign how such a tool might be studied in real world settings in a way that reflected outcomes of greatest importance to patients and families. We used the Nominal Group Technique and engaged thirty three patients and caregivers and ten multidisciplinary clinicians in structured virtual sessions to identify the outcomes on which subsequent studies should hinge. Our findings reveal a significant misalignment between current industry trends and patient priorities. While the market emphasizes the scribe function for billing, stakeholders overwhelmingly prioritized the AIPHAs role in longitudinal care management and post visit coordination. The most critical outcome identified was the impact on communication and respect, suggesting that patients view AI as a mechanism to improve the human to human dynamic and ensure a shared understanding of the care plan. Our findings further highlighted that the primary hurdle for the use of patient held AI is not technical utility but clinician trust and the need for formal consent processes. Importantly, as this technology is new and integration into the clinical experience is still being explored, patients cannot assume they will have access to the transcript of their own encounter when that record is created and held by the health system. This gap highlights the potential value of a patient held tool, preserving discussions from their visit and follow up steps in clearer detail than they may receive in their clinical note or traditional visit summary. From a system perspective, this transition requires a strategic shift from measuring workflow focused efficiency to measuring patient side advocacy and engagement. By centering the evaluation of AI on these patient defined metrics and fundamentally designing subsequent AI investigations using a partnership model, health systems can move beyond simple automation toward a model of care delivery that empowers patients to navigate complex clinical journeys with greater autonomy and clarity.

Background: Cardiovascular (CV) screening is critical for personnel deploying to Antarctica, where geographic isolation and limited medical care make the management of acute cardiovascular events challenging. The utility of contemporary risk prediction tools such as the AHA PREVENT equations in this unique population remains uncertain. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 154 individuals referred for enhanced CV evaluation before deployment to the U.S. Antarctic Program (USAP). Participants were evaluated across three temporal cohorts (2018-2020, 2021-2023, and 2024-2026). Demographics, CV risk factors, cardiac testing, and deployment clearance outcomes were collected. Risk was estimated using the Framingham Risk Score (FRS), AHA/ACC Pooled Cohort Equations (PCE), and AHA PREVENT risk models. Results: The cohort was predominantly male (79.9%; mean age 44.6 {+/-} 14.6 years), and abnormal ECG was the most common referral trigger (70.8%). Median 10-year risk was low by PREVENT and FRS and borderline elevated by PCE (PREVENT 2.7% [IQR 1.1-6.6], FRS 2.3% [IQR 0.5-7.1], and PCE 6.1% [IQR 2.4-9.2]). Among 72 participants with all scores, 51% were classified discordantly; PREVENT ASCVD agreed closely with FRS (=0.77) but poorly with PCE (=0.24-0.35), which consistently estimated higher risk. PCE was calculable in 52.6% versus 70.8% for PREVENT. Overall, 132 participants (85.7%) were cleared for deployment, while 8 (5.2%) were not physically qualified (NPQ); 6 of these NPQs were due to cardiovascular causes. Of 22 cardiac medical evacuations during the study period, 21 involved individuals without prior advanced cardiovascular screening. One screened individual was evacuated for symptoms subsequently found to have no cardiac cause. Conclusions: Risk calculators disagree substantially in the fitness-selected population. We recommend PREVENT as the primary risk-stratification tool as it is the most contemporary derivation, incorporates renal function, is race-agnostic, extends to heart failure, applies from age 30, and agrees closely with FRS, easing transition. Targeted imaging, including coronary artery calcium scoring, may supplement intermediate-risk candidates.

Rural patients with heart failure (HF) have poor access to care, worse outcomes, and may benefit from at-home monitoring. We evaluated whether foot temperature measured using a thermographic floor mat was associated with invasively measured cardiac output and whether longitudinal temperature changes preceded HF events. We conducted a two-part prospective, observational single-center study using the SmartMat (Podimetrics, Somerville, MA), which acquires plantar thermograms and ambient temperature. In the acute study, patients undergoing clinically indicated right heart catheterization completed 4 scans on the same day. In the chronic study, patients with a HF hospitalization in the past year and New York Heart Association Class II-III symptoms were instructed to use the device and a scale daily for 6 months. A HF event was defined as receiving at least one dose of intravenous or subcutaneous diuretic. Thirty patients were enrolled in the acute study. Mean right hallux temperature positively correlated with thermodilution cardiac output (r=0.63, p<0.001). 42 patients were enrolled in the chronic study. Among patients experiencing an HF event, ambient-adjusted hallux temperature declined in the 15 days immediately preceding the event compared with days 15-30 before the event. Plantar thermograms are associated with invasively measured cardiac output and may detect subclinical worsening before HF events. Foot temperature may provide complementary information regarding HF decompensation, supporting further evaluation of plantar thermography for remote HF monitoring.

Biomedical artificial intelligence (AI) increasingly relies on heterogeneous data sources, yet differences in data structure, terminology, evidence quality, and provenance complicate their integration into reliable knowledge resources. Here, we develop an evidence-aware framework for processing and integrating heterogeneous pharmacovigilance data from FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) reports, biomedical literature, clinical trials, and electronic health records in Mass General Brigham. The framework combines large language model (LLM)-based information extraction, ontology-driven semantic normalization, cross-source evidence assessment, statistical and machine learning-based prioritization, and ingredient-based adverse drug event (ADE) relationship inference to transform heterogeneous evidence into a structured and evidence-based knowledge resource. The constructed knowledge system contains 11,588 drug nodes, 44,843 ingredient nodes, 3,275 ADE nodes, 993 indication nodes, and more than 2.47 million relationships, with each drug-ADE relationship assigned a confidence score. We further developed a drug-level web interface for accessing the knowledge resource and validated its utility in downstream AI tasks. Specifically, incorporating the developed knowledge resource improved the comprehensiveness, relevance, and overall quality of LLM-based drug-specific ADE synthesis and improved the precision and F1 score of clinical ADE relation extraction. These results demonstrate that AI-assisted processing combined with evidence-aware curation can transform heterogeneous biomedical evidence into reusable, AI-ready knowledge with explicit provenance and evidence strength information. The framework provides a general strategy for integrating heterogeneous biomedical data to support reproducible knowledge construction and downstream biomedical AI applications.

Background: Cost-effectiveness analyses (CEA) built on simulation models are usually delivered through project-specific scripts. Each new model, and often each new question, rebuilds the same scaffolding: parameter management, calibration, base-case analysis, sensitivity analysis and export. This is costly, and is where traceability between an estimate and the model version producing it is lost. We present THALASSA, a web application providing this infrastructure once, for any model satisfying a small programming contract. Methods: A simulation model is connected by one file implementing a fixed contract of R functions that determine its behaviour. THALASSA exposes the complete CEA workflow in a browser: a generated overview of the connected model, parameter editing, calibration, base-case comparison with the efficiency curve, and deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analysis at a willingness-to-pay threshold, each with timestamped file export carrying the parameter values it was run with. Every session is bound to a repository version, so results carry their generating model version. Results: We demonstrate THALASSA on two public models of contrasting difficulty: a simple tutorial model and a generic cancer screening model with two competing natural-history pathways and a 21-dimensional calibration deliberately built to be more complex. Both ran on the same unmodified setup, implementing the same contract, with no code changes. Conclusions: Separating analysis infrastructure from model logic makes the CEA workflow reusable across projects and reproducible by construction. A modelling team can move from a versioned repository to audit-ready, exportable CEA outputs without writing analysis code. The integration effort does not grow with model size and one installation serves unrelated projects.

Objective. Temperature readings are routinely stratified by race and ethnicity, though significant group differences may reflect physiology, instrument noise, or categorization rather than biology. This study tests whether these categories partition facial infrared thermography measurements beyond individual variation and baseline device noise. Approach. A secondary analysis of thermography data (n = 951 adults) compares inner-canthus maximum (TCEmax) and full-face maximum (Tmax) temperatures across five administrative categories via one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), mixed-effects modeling, Bland-Altman analysis against oral reference, and Monte Carlo sensitivity analysis. Main results. ANOVA returns significant group differences (p < 0.001; eta-squared = 0.04 for TCEmax, 0.03 for Tmax), but the total spread (0.2 to 0.3 degrees Celsius) is comparable to device accuracy and within-subject variability. Individual variation accounts for 95% of TCEmax variance, and adding simulated Gaussian noise to participant-level temperatures (sigma = 0.10 to 0.30 degrees Celsius) preserves the complete group-mean rank order in as few as 37.5% of iterations. Significance. Testing whether a group difference survives perturbation at the scale of instrument accuracy offers a check against treating significance alone as evidence of physiology. Here, observed group differences are small relative to measurement variability, and their physiological interpretation remains uncertain, with implications for clinical tools that treat administrative categories as biologically meaningful.

Background: Conventional performance metrics do not indicate whether artificial intelligence (AI)-platforms and radiologists are right or wrong on the same examinations, nor whether their non-agreement is more often beneficial or harmful. Objective: To develop, illustrate, and apply directional metrics quantifying non-agreement between radiologists and AI-platforms against a common reference standard, and to adapt a fragility-based framework for quantifying the statistical robustness of these metrics. Methods: We defined Positive Non-Agreement (PNA, AI-platform correct, radiologist incorrect), Negative Non-Agreement (NNA, radiologist correct, AI-platform incorrect), and Net Non-Agreement (NENA, their difference). Metrics were illustrated in three hypothetical scenarios of 1,000 examinations each and applied to three previously published AI-radiologist studies on pulmonary embolism and mammography. Bootstrap confidence intervals were calculated, and a reclassification fragility index (FI) quantified the minimum case reclassification needed to remove statistical support for NENA's direction. Results: In illustration, NENA was positive in two scenarios and negative in one. In the three published studies, NENA ranged from -4.18% to +10.74% and decreased consistently with increasing radiologist experience (junior residents, +6.27%; consultants, +1.45%), a gradient driven primarily by declining PNA with modest increase in NNA. The reclassification FI was defined for all three illustrative scenarios (range, 0.10%-1.70%) and for six of the seven comparisons from these studies (range, 0.34%-4.31%), but not for the weakest comparison, whose confidence interval for NENA included zero. Conclusions: PNA, NNA, and NENA provide a directional, case-level complement to conventional performance metrics for AI-radiologist non-agreement. The accompanying reclassification FI offers a statistically grounded, generalizable method for quantifying their robustness.

Background: Self-supervised learning may improve segmentation when labelled data are limited, but its benefit may depend on model and initialisation strategy. This study evaluated in-domain masked-reconstruction pretraining across limited annotation budgets. Methods: The International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) 2016 development set was partitioned into 765 images for self-supervised pretraining, 94 for fine-tuning and 41 for validation. Five nested annotation budgets (12-94 images) and five seeds were evaluated on the 379-image test set. A custom U-Net compared random and in-domain self-supervised initialisation; a ResNet-34 U-Net compared random, ImageNet, in-domain self-supervised and sequential ImageNet-to-self-supervised initialisation. Models trained with 94 labelled images were evaluated without adaptation on ISIC 2017. A separate experiment examined restoration-based pretraining. Results: In the custom U-Net, self-supervised pretraining achieved higher mean Dice than random initialisation at all five budgets, including 0.664 versus 0.615 with 12 labels and 0.811 versus 0.768 with 94 labels. Seed-level 95% confidence intervals for paired differences excluded zero at 47 and 94 labels but not at the other budgets. With 47 labels, the self-supervised model achieved mean Dice of 0.789, compared with 0.768 for random initialisation with 94 labels. In ResNet-34, ImageNet initialisation achieved higher mean Dice than in-domain self-supervised pretraining at all five budgets, and adding self-supervised pretraining after ImageNet reduced mean Dice at four of five budgets. All six 94-label configurations achieved lower mean Dice on ISIC 2017 than ISIC 2016. In the restoration experiment, mean Dice was 0.686 with random initialisation and 0.638-0.642 following pretraining. Conclusions: In-domain masked-reconstruction pretraining improved mean Dice relative to random initialisation in the custom U-Net, but not consistently in the ResNet-34 U-Net, where ImageNet initialisation performed better at every budget. Adding self-supervised pretraining after ImageNet provided no consistent gain. These findings are specific to the dermoscopic lesion-segmentation experiments and do not establish melanoma-specific diagnostic or clinical performance.

Objectives: To evaluate change in physical function and probable sarcopenia following a 36-week community multicomponent exercise programme (Vivifrail model) across two consecutive cycles, and to assess the consistency of this change between cohorts. Study design: Quasi-experimental, single-arm, repeated-measures service evaluation. Ninety-two older adults (2025-2026 cohort; mean age 75.9 years, 88.0% women) completed baseline and post-intervention assessments; an independent 2024-2025 cohort (n = 86) was analysed jointly for replication (n = 178). Main outcome measures: Short Physical Performance Battery (SPPB) score (primary); Timed Up and Go (TUG), handgrip strength, 6-metre walk time and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (secondary); probable sarcopenia (EWGSOP2), SPPB-based frailty category, and a fall-risk indicator computed identically in both cohorts. Results: SPPB improved by a mean of 1.33 points (Cohen's d = 0.96; p < .001), with concordant improvement in all four secondary outcomes (all q < .005). 72.8% reached the substantial minimal clinically important difference. Probable sarcopenia fell from 17.4% to 5.4% (p = .006), and frailty category shifted toward higher functional levels (p < .001). Effect sizes were consistent between cohorts for SPPB, handgrip and 6-metre walk; the Time x Cohort interaction was significant for TUG only. In the pooled sample, elevated fall risk fell from 19.7% to 11.2% (p = .002). Conclusions: A 36-week multicomponent exercise programme was associated with clinically meaningful, reproducible improvement in physical function and a reduction in probable sarcopenia across two independent cohorts. The single-arm design precludes causal inference.